Skip to main content
PeptideClock Logo Icon
PeptideClock
DashboardToolsGuidesDatabase
🚀Updates

Multi-Vial Dashboard Launch: Track All Your Peptides in One Place

Introducing our new Multi-Vial Dashboard - track potency decay across multiple peptides simultaneously with color-coded status indicators and smart sorting.

Peptide Clock Team
Updated Mar 21, 2026
#dashboard#features#tracking#updates
Multi-Vial Dashboard Launch: Track All Your Peptides in One Place

The original calculator solved one narrow problem well: it told you what happened to a single vial under a single set of storage assumptions. The moment people started keeping several reconstituted vials in the fridge at the same time, that single-vial workflow stopped being enough. The same questions kept coming back in slightly different forms. Which vial is oldest? Which one is drifting toward the discard window first? Which one was mixed in saline instead of BAC water? And which nickname corresponds to the unlabelled amber vial sitting in the back of the shelf?

The Multi-Vial Dashboard exists to answer those questions in one place. Instead of making users re-run the main calculator one vial at a time, it keeps multiple vials visible side by side and applies the same potency logic across all of them. That is the real value of the release: not a new decay model, but a better way to organize the same model around how people actually manage several active vials.

Why this tool is different from the main calculator

The dashboard is built for comparison and memory, not just for a one-time calculation. Each vial keeps its own peptide type, reconstitution date, storage method, solvent choice, nickname, and notes. That means the dashboard can surface the current potency estimate at a glance while preserving the small pieces of context that usually get lost first in real use. A label such as “Blue Cap” or “Morning Stack” sounds trivial until three visually similar vials are sitting next to each other and the user is trying to remember what was mixed when.

The interface also uses the same underlying decay assumptions as the main calculator, so the numbers stay internally consistent. The exponential-decay model, solvent penalty, and freeze-sensitivity rules do not change when a vial moves into the dashboard. What changes is the way those assumptions are presented. Sorting by potency, by age, or by peptide name gives users a much faster picture of what needs attention than a set of disconnected single-vial calculations.

What the first release is meant to do well

Version 1 is focused on the core tasks that matter most. You can add multiple vials, keep each one separate, view them in either a card-based grid or a denser list layout, and sort them according to the question you care about in the moment. If the immediate question is “what should I finish first,” potency sorting is useful. If the question is “what has been sitting longest,” date sorting is better. If the question is simple organization, peptide-name sorting is the easiest view.

The color coding is there for the same reason. It is not meant to dramatize the result; it is meant to compress attention. A vial marked excellent, good, warning, or critical can be triaged quickly without forcing the user to parse every number before deciding what deserves a second look.

Privacy remains the default, not a feature add-on

The dashboard keeps to the same privacy promise as the rest of the site. Data is stored locally in the browser, no account is required, and nothing is synchronized to a server. That matters for two reasons. First, it fits the repo’s privacy constraints. Second, it makes the tool usable for exactly the people who asked for it: users who wanted better organization without turning a simple storage log into a service that depended on login, syncing, or data collection.

If you open the Dashboard, the first-use flow is deliberately minimal. Add the peptide, the date, the storage method, and the solvent, then save it with whatever nickname or note will make future identification easier. The system recalculates when you revisit the page, so the dashboard behaves less like a static note and more like a living storage surface.

Where this tool fits in the broader workflow

The dashboard does not replace the Potency Decay Calculator, and it does not replace the Peptide Calculator. The main calculator is still the right place to explore a single setup in detail. The peptide calculator is still the right place for reconstitution and unit math. The dashboard sits one layer above both: it is where the user keeps track of what is already in use and compares active vials against each other.

That also explains why some features are still intentionally absent. Editing, export/import, and charting are natural next steps, but the first release needed to prove that the core storage-and-visibility workflow was useful before layering on more UI complexity. The page already hints at that direction, yet the current release is intentionally constrained to the simple question it was built to solve: can users manage several live vials without losing track of them?

Try it in the workflow it was built for

The dashboard is most helpful when at least two active vials are competing for your attention. If you want to see the full workflow in context, use the Dashboard alongside the Potency Decay Calculator, the Peptide Calculator, and the Complete Reconstitution Guide. That combination covers setup, math, time-based tracking, and ongoing vial management without forcing the user to piece the system together from memory.

Related Tools:

Read More: